Reohorn v Barry Corporation: CA 1956

As to the landlord’s intention to reconstruct the premises on opposing a renewal: ‘[a] man cannot properly be said to ‘intend’ to do . . work when he has not got the means to carry it out. He may hope to do so; he will not have the intention to do so.’

Judges:

Denning LJ

Citations:

[1956] 1 WLR 845

Statutes:

Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 30(1)(g)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedDolgellau Golf Club v Hett CA 3-Apr-1998
The landlord opposed the renewal of the tenancy saying that it wanted to run a golf club on the land. The tenant replied, saying that the businees had little prospect of success.
Held: Where the landlord had expressed intention to commence . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Landlord and Tenant

Updated: 15 August 2022; Ref: scu.216664