The defendant appealed against his sentence for communicating information likely to be of assistance to an enemy.
Held: The sentence for communicating information was reduced to 5.5 years’ imprisonment, while the longer consecutive sentence for collecting information was unchanged.
[1996] 1 CAR(S) 202
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – James, Regina v CACD 25-Jun-2009
The defendant appealed against his conviction for communicating information likely to be useful to an enemy. His sentence was heavier because of the trust placed in him as an army officer, but the relationship with the foreign power had not fully . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Criminal Sentencing
Updated: 23 December 2021; Ref: scu.373759