The respondent built a coach house on the site of a former building with some history of residential use, but within the green belt. The question of whether it replaced an existing dwelling was one of fact and degree for the inspector. He had used the word ‘inequitable’ in justifying his decision, but this did not defeat his decision.
Citations:
Gazette 07-Jan-2000
Planning
Updated: 09 April 2022; Ref: scu.85503