Regina v Secretary of State for Home Department ex parte Lul Omar Adan: Admn 24 Nov 1998

A country which had previously rejected an asylum application could nevertheless properly be a safe third country to which a asylum applicant could be deported. Germany is a country which would abide by its obligations under international treaties.

Citations:

Times 18-Dec-1998, [1998] EWHC Admin 1085

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Asylum and Immigration Act 1996 2(c)

Citing:

Appealed toRegina v Secretary of State for Department (ex parte Adan) and Regina v Secretary of State for Home Department (ex parte Subaskaran) etc CA 23-Jul-1999
Where a country was a signatory to the Convention, but chose to interpret it so as not to give the same protection against oppression by non-state agents which would be given here, the Home Secretary was wrong to certify such countries, in this case . .

Cited by:

Appeal fromRegina v Secretary of State for Department (ex parte Adan) and Regina v Secretary of State for Home Department (ex parte Subaskaran) etc CA 23-Jul-1999
Where a country was a signatory to the Convention, but chose to interpret it so as not to give the same protection against oppression by non-state agents which would be given here, the Home Secretary was wrong to certify such countries, in this case . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Immigration

Updated: 27 May 2022; Ref: scu.139206