Regina v Preston Supplementary Benefits Appeal Tribunal, Ex parte Moore: CA 1975

References: [1975] 1 WLR 624
Coram: Lord Denning MR
Ratio: Lord Denning MR observed that the courts should leave the tribunals to interpret the Supplementary Benefits Act in a broad reasonable way, according to the spirit and not the letter. To uphold the purposes of judicial review the ‘record is generously interpreted’.

Last Update: 04 April 2017
Ref: 442732