Regina v Peter John Brown and Others: CACD 27 Jul 2001

The defendants appealed convictions for conspiracy. There had been a large, admitted, conspiracy to cheat the revenue by mis-selling bonded tobacco etc. They criticised the judge’s direction on the extent of involvement required to be found part of a conspiracy. They argued that some express intention had to be shown. That argument failed. Other people involved, had been used by the Customs to co-operate in gaining further evidence, and the existence of that involvement had been withheld from the defence with the consent of the judge. That procedure had been proper.

Judges:

Lord Justice Mantell, Mr Justice Rougier, Mr Justice Grigson

Citations:

[2001] EWCA Civ 1771

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Cited – Regina v Scott 1979
. .
Cited – Regina v Martin and White CACD 8-Dec-1997
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Customs and Excise, Crime

Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.159906