Regina v Nethercott: CACD 2 Nov 2001

Where defendant sought to rely upon a defence of duress, evidence of subsequent acts of violence may be admissible in support of that contention provided a sufficient connection could be made. Here, the defendant wanted to adduce evidence that those under whose direction he claimed to have acted had stabbed him causing serious injury some twelve weeks later. That evidence was relevant, and should have been admitted.

Judges:

Lord Justice Waller, Mr Justice Curtis and Mr Justice Davis

Citations:

Times 12-Dec-2001

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Evidence

Updated: 29 August 2022; Ref: scu.167114