Whilst s.17(2) and Schedule 6 of the Firearms Act 1968 do not on their true construction require the imposition of a consecutive sentence for possession of a firearm in the course of committing an offence listed in Schedule 2, it should be the norm to do so, while at the same time having regard to the principle of totality.
Citations:
[1986] 8 Crim App R (S) 372
Statutes:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Approved – Regina v Bottomley CACD 1985
Albeit an offender who commits a robbery or other offence while carrying a firearm must normally expect a consecutive sentence for the offence of carrying that firearm, ‘No doubt the sentencer is entitled in his discretion to follow the course of . .
Cited by:
Cited – Attorney General’s Reference No 88 of 2002 (Hahn and Webster) CACD 7-Nov-2003
The Attorney General referred the sentences as too lenient for armed robbery, and aggravated vehicle taking. The defendants worked as a team, and used an imitation firearm, and threatened a victim with it.
Held: The possession of firearms . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Criminal Sentencing
Updated: 29 April 2022; Ref: scu.187654