(Canada) Fauteux J described the difference between a crime of basic intent and one of specific intent: ‘In considering the question of mens rea, a distinction is to be made between (i) intention as applied to acts considered in relation to their purposes and (ii) intention as applied to acts apart from their purposes. A general intent attending the commission of an act is, in some cases, the only intent required to constitute the crime while, in others, there must be, in addition to that general intent, a specific intent attending the purpose for the commission of the act.’
Judges:
Fauteux J
Citations:
(1960) 128 Can CC 289
Jurisdiction:
Canada
Cited by:
Cited – Regina v Heron; Regina v Storey; Regina v Thomas HL 25-Mar-1982
The defendants appealed against their convictions for conspiracy to counterfeit gold coins. They said no evidence had been brought to suggest their intention to commit any dishonest act. The House was asked whether the offence was one of specific or . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Crime
Updated: 05 December 2022; Ref: scu.258438