Regina v G: CACD 1998

Inconsistent verdicts

Citations:

[1998] Crim LR 483

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedRegina v Rafferty (WA); Regina v Rafferty (WK) CACD 5-Apr-2004
The defendants appealed, saying the jury verdicts were not consistent.
Held: Counsel presenting such an appeal should ensure that the transcripts of the cases now cited were put before the court. To have a verdict set aside for inconsistency . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Criminal Practice

Updated: 06 May 2022; Ref: scu.196066