Regina v Director of the Serious Fraud Office Ex Parte Smith: QBD 11 Mar 1992

The Serious Fraud Office may interview a defendant after he has been charged, but must give the caution and act accordingly and with caution.

Citations:

Gazette 11-Mar-1992

Statutes:

Criminal Law Act 1987 2(2)

Citing:

Appealed to – Regina v Director of Serious Fraud Office, ex Parte Smith HL 15-Jul-1992
The applicant having been cautioned for an offence under the Companies Act 1985, he objected to being required to answer questions put to him in connection with the matter by the Director of the Serious Fraud Office under the 1987 Act.
Held: . .

Cited by:

Appeal from – Regina v Director of Serious Fraud Office, ex Parte Smith HL 15-Jul-1992
The applicant having been cautioned for an offence under the Companies Act 1985, he objected to being required to answer questions put to him in connection with the matter by the Director of the Serious Fraud Office under the 1987 Act.
Held: . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Criminal Practice

Updated: 09 April 2022; Ref: scu.86552