(Crown Court at Snaresbrook) The court acceded to the submission on trying a charge under the 2008 Regulations, that there was no case to answer in the context of a contract for building services with a consumer on the basis that such a contract did not fall within the definition of ‘commercial practice’ within the Regulations.
Judges:
Mr Recorder Lowe QC
Citations:
[2012] CTLC 109
Statutes:
Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008
Cited by:
Unpersuasive – X Ltd, Regina v CACD 23-May-2013
The prosecutor appealed after the judge at the crown court had found no case to answer on a prosecution of the company under the 2008 Regulations. The company had sold a home security system to an elderly and vulnerable man. His family found that he . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Crime, Consumer
Updated: 18 May 2022; Ref: scu.510093