Procter and Gamble Co v Office for Harmonisation In the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs): CA 29 Jul 1999

The Board of Appeal, hearing an appeal from an examiner’s decision on a trade mark application, need not restrict itself to hearing issues raised before the examiner. The close continuity of function between the two offices, was demonstrated by their rules. The Appeal Board could exercise any function exercisable by the examiner, and so could hear new issues.

Citations:

Times 29-Jul-1999

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Intellectual Property

Updated: 28 April 2022; Ref: scu.85052