Pitts and Another v Cadogan: LT 28 Mar 2007

LT LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – preliminary issues -procedure – deferment rate and hope value – whether respondent on appeal entitled to seek addition for hope value – whether respondent entitled to seek higher price than LVT determined – held respondent entitled to seek addition for hope value but not entitled to seek higher price than that determined by LVT.

Citations:

[2007] EWLands LRA – 79 – 2006

Links:

Bailii

Cited by:

Appeal fromCadogan v Pitts and Another CA 4-Dec-2007
. .
At Lands TribunalEarl Cadogan v Pitts and Wang; Similar HL 10-Dec-2008
The House considered the basis of valuation on an acquisition of the freehold reversion of a lease under the 1967 Act of the three elements, the rent, vacant possession after the lease, and the marriage or hope value of the two interests when . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Land

Updated: 10 July 2022; Ref: scu.251194