Papillo v Switzerland: ECHR 27 Jan 2015

The applicant alleged that his detention was contrary to Article 5-1 in that it was held in prison and not in a health care clinic. Relying on Article 5-5, it also complains about not being able to obtain compensation in this regard.

Judges:

Guido Raimondi, P

Citations:

43368/08 – Chamber Judgment, [2015] ECHR 86

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

European Convention on Human Rights

Jurisdiction:

Human Rights

Human Rights

Updated: 24 October 2022; Ref: scu.541935