Click the case name for better results:

Hopson (Darren) v Chief Constable of North Wales Police: QBD 25 Oct 2002

The applicant challenged the imposition of a sex offender’s order, on the basis that having been convicted of the last offence, that was the date after which he had to have behaved in such a way as to cause the concern necessary in turn to found an application. Held: The Act required only such behaviour … Continue reading Hopson (Darren) v Chief Constable of North Wales Police: QBD 25 Oct 2002

Governor of Pentonville Prison ex parte Khubchandani: QBD 1980

The court considered whether certain conduct, part of which took place in Ghana, would, mutatis mutandis , have constituted an offence over which the English court had jurisdiction. Held: ‘Where a deception is made in this country, but the property is obtained outside the jurisdiction, there is no offence under the English law either under … Continue reading Governor of Pentonville Prison ex parte Khubchandani: QBD 1980

Studdy v Sanders and others: 1823

Legal professional privilege. Citations: [1823] 2 D and R 347 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Miller Gardner Solicitors, Regina (on the Application of) v Minshull Street Crown Court Admn 20-Dec-2002 Police investigating crime obtained a warrant to search a solicitor’s offices for details of their clients. The solicitors appealed. Held: The details … Continue reading Studdy v Sanders and others: 1823

White v Procurator Fiscal, Perth: HCJ 27 Jan 1999

The defendant challenged his conviction for supplying false information on applying for a shotgun certificate. He had said that he had no convictions, but failed to disclose an adminishment, refusing to add the case to the application, having explained to the constable that he had not been convicted. Held: ‘There may have been an error … Continue reading White v Procurator Fiscal, Perth: HCJ 27 Jan 1999

Sheldrake v Director of Public Prosecutions; Attorney General’s Reference No 4 of 2002: HL 14 Oct 2004

Appeals were brought complaining as to the apparent reversal of the burden of proof in road traffic cases and in cases under the Terrorism Acts. Was a legal or an evidential burden placed on a defendant? Held: Lord Bingham of Cornhill said: ‘The overriding concern is that a trial should be fair, and the presumption … Continue reading Sheldrake v Director of Public Prosecutions; Attorney General’s Reference No 4 of 2002: HL 14 Oct 2004

Regina v Derek William Bentley (Deceased): CACD 30 Jul 1998

The defendant had been convicted of murder in 1952, and hung. A court hearing an appeal after many years must apply laws from different eras to different aspects. The law of the offence (of murder) to be applied was that at the time of the offence. In this case however the summing up was so … Continue reading Regina v Derek William Bentley (Deceased): CACD 30 Jul 1998

Her Majestys Attorney General for Jersey v Holley: PC 15 Jun 2005

(Jersey) The defendant appealed his conviction for murder, claiming a misdirection on the law of provocation. A chronic alcoholic, he had admitted killing his girlfriend with an axe. Nine law lords convened to seek to reconcile conflicting decisions of the House as to provocation. Held: The defence of provocation has two ingredients. The first, subjective … Continue reading Her Majestys Attorney General for Jersey v Holley: PC 15 Jun 2005

Regina v Coutts: HL 19 Jul 2006

The defendant was convicted of murder. Evidence during the trial suggested a possibility of manslaughter, but neither the defence nor prosecution proposed the alternate verdict. The defendant now appealed saying that the judge had an independent duty to leave that option to the jury. Held: The appeal succeeded. The judge should have left a manslaughter … Continue reading Regina v Coutts: HL 19 Jul 2006

Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions: HL 23 May 1935

Golden Thread of British Justice – Proof of Intent The appellant had been convicted of the murder of his wife. She had left him and returned to live with her mother. He went to the house. He said he intended to frighten her that he would kill himself if she did not return. He wired … Continue reading Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions: HL 23 May 1935

Mancini v Director of Public Prosecutions: HL 1941

There are exceptional cases to the rule in Woolmington for: ‘offences where onus of proof is specially dealt with by statute’. ‘There is no reason to repeat to the jury the warning as to reasonable doubt again and again, provided that the direction is plainly given.’ The House considered the reasonable man test in the … Continue reading Mancini v Director of Public Prosecutions: HL 1941

Sahota, Regina v: CACD 5 Apr 2006

Appeal from conviction of doing an act with intent to pervert the course of public justice. Misidentification of driver in serious road accident. Judges: Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers Citations: [2006] EWCA Crim 903 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 24 November 2022; Ref: scu.241499

Buckler’s Case: 1551

The indictment read that the defendant on a charge of murder had ‘feloniously struck, killed, and murdered’ the victim. Held: The words were sufficient without an allegation of ‘malice aforethought’. The word murder implies ‘malice aforethought’. Citations: (1551) 1 Dyer 68, 73 ER 145 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 24 November 2022; Ref: scu.223122

Regina v Allan: CACD 6 Apr 2001

Citations: [2001] EWCA Crim 1027, Unreported, 6 April 2001 Statutes: Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Attorney General’s Reference (No 5 of 2002) HL 14-Oct-2004 The Attorney General sought the correct interpretation of section 17 where a court was asked as to whether evidence obtained from a … Continue reading Regina v Allan: CACD 6 Apr 2001

Deaton v Attorney General and Revenue Commissioners: 1963

(Supreme Court of Ireland) The court looked at a law in which the choice of alternative penalties was left to the executive: ‘There is a clear distinction between the prescription of a fixed penalty and the selection of a penalty for a particular case. The prescription of a fixed penalty is the statement of a … Continue reading Deaton v Attorney General and Revenue Commissioners: 1963

Regina v Fletcher: 1859

A conviction for rape was upheld in respect of sexual intercourse with a girl of weak intellect. The jury found that she was incapable of giving consent due to her defect of reasoning. Citations: (1859) Bell CC 63, [1859] 169 ER 1168 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 24 November 2022; Ref: scu.196594

Cheltenham and Gloucester Plc v Appleyard and Another: CA 15 Mar 2004

The owners had purchased their property with a loan from the BBBS. A charge was then given to BCCI, which charge said no further charge could be registered without BCCI ‘s consent. The C and G agreed to lend a sum to refinance the entire borrowings, but on the day it was to be completed, … Continue reading Cheltenham and Gloucester Plc v Appleyard and Another: CA 15 Mar 2004

Regina v Atkinson: 1 Mar 1985

Jury Directions in diminished responsibility case. Citations: [1985] Cr LR 314 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Disapproved – Regina v Dietschmann HL 27-Feb-2003 Voluntary drunkenness No Diminished Responsibility The defendant had been convicted of murder. At the time of the assault, he was both intoxicated to the point of losing his inhibitions and was … Continue reading Regina v Atkinson: 1 Mar 1985

Bernard Keck and Daniel Mithouard (Rec 1993,p I-6097) (SV93-431) (Judgment): ECJ 24 Nov 1993

Free movement of goods – Prohibition of resale at a loss. A national law is fair if the rules it applies deal equally to imported and home goods. Europa Free movement of goods – Quantitative restrictions – Measures having equivalent effect – Concept – Obstacles to trade resulting from disparities between national legislation laying down … Continue reading Bernard Keck and Daniel Mithouard (Rec 1993,p I-6097) (SV93-431) (Judgment): ECJ 24 Nov 1993

Varley and Others, Regina v: CACD 21 Jun 2019

Prosecution appeal by the Appellant (‘the SFO’) under s.58 and following of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 against a Ruling together with other related rulings), in which he upheld the various submissions of the Respondents that there was no case to answer in respect of the count/s of the indictment which concerned each of them. … Continue reading Varley and Others, Regina v: CACD 21 Jun 2019

Commissioner of The Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 22 May 2019

The complainant requested information about crimes reported on the Parliamentary estate. The Commissioner’s decision is that the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police failed to respond to the request within 20 working days and has therefore breached section 10 of the FOIA. The Commissioner requires the MPS to take the following steps to ensure compliance with … Continue reading Commissioner of The Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 22 May 2019

De Boucherville v The State of Mauritius: PC 18 Apr 1984

The defendant appealed against his conviction for murder. Judges: Lord Templeman, Lord Jauncey of Tullichettle, Lord Slynn of Hadley, Lord Woolf, Lord Lloyd of Berwick Citations: [1994] 2 AC 324, [1994] UKPC 5, [1994] UKPC 12 Links: Bailii, Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: See Also – De Boucherville v The State of Mauritius … Continue reading De Boucherville v The State of Mauritius: PC 18 Apr 1984

GR, Regina v: CACD 9 Dec 2020

Judges: Lady Justice Carr DBE Mrs Justice Mcgowan DBE His Honour Judge Katz (Sitting as a Judge of the Cacd) Citations: [2020] EWCA Crim 1742 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 24 November 2022; Ref: scu.682461

Wilson-Ford, Regina v: CACD 17 Sep 2020

Judges: Lord Justice Singh Mrs Justice Whipple DBE Mr Justice Fraser Citations: [2020] EWCA Crim 1342 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 24 November 2022; Ref: scu.682457

F, Regina v: CACD 29 Jul 2009

Application for leave to appeal – rejection of claim that some charges were an abuse of process. Judges: Lord Justice Pill Citations: [2009] EWCA Crim 1639 Links: Bailii Statutes: Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 23 November 2022; Ref: scu.415064

Weber and Saravia v Germany: ECHR 29 Jun 2006

(Admissibility) ‘The first applicant is a freelance journalist who works for various German and foreign newspapers, radio and television stations on a regular basis. In particular, she investigates matters that are subject to the surveillance of the Federal Intelligence Service, notably armaments, preparations for war, drug and arms trafficking and money laundering. In order to … Continue reading Weber and Saravia v Germany: ECHR 29 Jun 2006

Hakala, Regina v: CACD 19 Mar 2002

Citations: [2002] EWCA Crim 730, [2002] Crim LR 578 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Noye, Kenneth, Regina v CACD 22-Mar-2011 The prisoner appealed against his conviction for murder on reference from the CCRC. There were new doubts about the reliabiity of the expert forensic expert. Held: The appeal was dismissed. … Continue reading Hakala, Regina v: CACD 19 Mar 2002

NW and Others, Regina v: CACD 23 Jan 2008

The prosecutor appealed from a terminal ruling, acceding to a submission of no case to answer advanced on behalf of all four defendants.Proof to the criminal standard can be discharged by circumstantial evidence and then by inference: ‘No doubt, if such an inference is prima facie there to be drawn, an evidential burden is cast … Continue reading NW and Others, Regina v: CACD 23 Jan 2008

Green, Regina v: CACD 25 May 2007

Two defendants had been convicted as principals of conspiracy to supply drugs. The defendant appealed a confiscation order. Held: Where the two defendants had been convicted of jointly receiving the proceeds, each defendant was properly made subject to a confiscation order for the entire amount. Judges: Moore-Bick LJ, David Clarke and Swift JJ Citations: [2007] … Continue reading Green, Regina v: CACD 25 May 2007

Porter, Regina v: CACD 16 Mar 2006

The defendant appealed his conviction of possession of indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs of children. The images had been deleted, and were irrecoverable, but they had originally been viewed through a program which created a smaller additional image for each original. Though the thumbnail images were no longer accessible without the original, they remained on the … Continue reading Porter, Regina v: CACD 16 Mar 2006

E v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 26 Feb 2002

A youth court remanded the appellant to a local authority with a requirement that the local authority detain him in secure accommodation. No such accommodation was however available. He was brought back to the Youth Court by a member of the youth offending team but he then absconded. He was later convicted of escape. An … Continue reading E v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 26 Feb 2002