Citations:
[2021] UKAITUR HU034002019
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Immigration
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.661838
[2021] UKAITUR HU034002019
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.661838
Sections 5(1), 5(2) and 5(3) Earlier Trade Marks – Treatment of descriptive / allusive elements
Sections 5(1), 5(2) and 5(3) Earlier Trade Marks – Particular visual / aural / conceptual considerations
[2019] UKIntelP o47419
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.661064
STAMP DUTY LAND TAX – transaction involving multiple dwellings – purchase of property with main house and an annexe – was enquiry validly opened by HMRC? – yes – did main house and annexe each count as a dwelling? – were main house and annexe both suitable for use as a single dwelling? – no – appeal dismissed.
[2021] UKFTT 17 (TC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.661734
[2021] UKAITUR HU165082019
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.661859
Sections 5(1), 5(2) and 5(3) Dilution Cases – Reputation
Section 5(4) Earlier Rights – Passing off (Issues arising from Registry proceedings)
Section 5(4) Earlier Rights – Standard of proof (evidential issues)
Revocation / Proof of Use – Dates – genuine use
Revocation / Proof of Use – Variant forms of marks – use with matter added or subtracted
[2019] UKIntelP o53519
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.661113
Reinstatement application following withdrawal – application refused
[2021] UKFTT 45 (TC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.661771
[2021] UKAITUR HU144712019
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.661856
[2020] EWCA Crim 1347
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.656600
[2021] UKAITUR HU117392019
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.661851
[2021] UKAITUR HU018042019
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.661835
The debtor had presented his own petition and a receiving order was made upon it. An arrangement was later made under which the debtor’s father paid the creditors 10s. in the pound and the creditors released their debts. The creditors withdrew their proofs of debt, and the debtor applied for the receiving order to be rescinded. The Official Receiver did not make any objection to the conduct of the debtor or ask for a public examination, and the registrar rescinded the receiving order. The Official Receiver appealed to the CA contending that the registrar had no jurisdiction to rescind a receiving order merely on the ground that a private arrangement had been made with the creditors; alternatively, if there was jurisdiction, it was wrongly exercised.
Held: None of the members of the Court doubted the existence of the jurisdiction or that Section 104 gave the bankruptcy court an absolute discretion to rescind or vary any of its orders. By a majority the Court held that a receiving order may properly be rescinded where the debtor has afterwards come to a private arrangement with his creditors, but emphasised that the court will act only with great caution and under special circumstances which make it clear that the arrangement is for the benefit of the creditors and where the debtor has not been guilty of any misconduct in connection with his insolvency.
[1897] 1 QB 241
England and Wales
Distinguished – In Re A Debtor No 12 of 1970 CA 1970
A bankruptcy petition was presented against the debtor and a receiving order was made upon it. He afterwards assured his creditors that he would pay them in full. The petitioning creditor was content with his assurance, but the other creditors were . .
Cited – Fitch v The Official Receiver CA 15-Nov-1995
Appeals from refusals to rescind bankruptcy orders. The bankrupts had, after lodging their appeals, persuaded the petitioning creditor and several other creditors to support the application. The first bankrupt was acting as agent in negotiations . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652378
Chief ICC Judge Briggs
[2020] EWHC 1833 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652334
Whether it is lawful for an adoption and fostering agency only to accept heterosexual evangelical Christians as the potential carers of fostered children.
The Honourable Mr Justice Julian Knowles
[2020] EWHC 1679 (Admin)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652385
Mostyn J
[2020] EWHC 1470 (Admin)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652390
Appeal from conviction – admission of hearsay evidence – JR of refusal to state a case
Peperall J
[2020] EWHC 1783 (Admin)
Criminal Justice Act 2003 114(1)(d)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652393
The considered a boiler house housed in a separate building. The issue was whether it came within section 1(3)(b) of the 1993 Act, that is, property which a qualifying tenant ‘is entitled under the terms of the lease of his flat to use in common with the occupiers of other premises’.
Held: Judge Marshall said that it did not, because the receipt of hot water by the tenants from the boiler did not amount to their ‘use’ of the boiler house.
[2007] 1 EGLR 121
Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652377
The parties disputed the validity of a will.
Held: (obiter) David Richards J said that because it was common ground that the terms of the attestation clause did not reflect the manner in which the signing of the will by the testator had been witnessed, the presumption of due execution could not arise from the attestation clause.
David Richards J
[2010] EWHC 1269 (Ch)
England and Wales
Cited – Wilson v Lassman ChD 7-Mar-2017
Claim for revocation of grant of probate on grounds that the will was not validly executed. It had been signed but before the witnesses attended.
Held: The will of the deceased was properly executed and attested in compliance with statute and . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652336
A bankruptcy petition was presented against the debtor and a receiving order was made upon it. He afterwards assured his creditors that he would pay them in full. The petitioning creditor was content with his assurance, but the other creditors were not. Despite their opposition the debtor applied to the registrar for the receiving order to be rescinded and the registrar rescinded it. The debtor now argued that although there was no scheme of arrangement or composition (and could not be having to the weight of opposition), and no ground upon which an adjudication could be annulled, nevertheless there were exceptional circumstances which justified the rescission of the receiving order.
Held: There were no such exceptional circumstances. It was merely a case of a debtor who had gained the belated sympathy of the petitioning creditor though not of all those who had submitted proofs, but who could make no concrete offer to his creditors.
Russell LJ distinguished Re Izod on the ground that in that case there was a de facto scheme of arrangement approved by all the creditors and arrived at in the course of proceedings subject to the scrutiny of the Official Receiver who did not oppose the application or insist upon a public examination. He concluded: ‘In our judgment the exceptional circumstances that justify the exercise of the power under Section 108(1) to rescind a receiving order and set aside the bankruptcy must be such as are closely analogous to the expressly recognised circumstances which enable a bankruptcy to be halted or annulled.’
Russell LJ
[1971] 1 WLR 1212
England and Wales
Distinguished – In Re Izod CA 1897
The debtor had presented his own petition and a receiving order was made upon it. An arrangement was later made under which the debtor’s father paid the creditors 10s. in the pound and the creditors released their debts. The creditors withdrew their . .
Cited – Fitch v The Official Receiver CA 15-Nov-1995
Appeals from refusals to rescind bankruptcy orders. The bankrupts had, after lodging their appeals, persuaded the petitioning creditor and several other creditors to support the application. The first bankrupt was acting as agent in negotiations . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652379
Taxpayer had liability but did not complete a tax return – HMRC discovered HICB charge liability and raised discovery assessment under s29(1)(a) TMA 1970 – was there discovery that income which ought to have been assessed to income tax had not been assessed? – held: no, as HICBC charge was a self-standing liability to income tax, not income assessable to income tax – assessment invalid – appeal allowed
[2020] UKFTT 256 (TC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652297
Appeal from judgment after trial judge proceeded with trial the defendant absent, and another Judge acceded to request for judgment to be set aside.
Held: The decision was restored. Appellate courts should be slow to overturn a judge’s decision to refuse or allow an application to set aside using CPR r 39.3 without being satisfied that the judge has been wrong in principle. No judicial comity required the judge hearing the application under CPR r 39.3(3) to follow the trial judge, and a judge hearing the application under CPR r 39.3(3) might reach a different decision on the same facts. The approach of the judge in the present case was therefore flawed.
Lewison, Popplewell, Carr LJJ
[2020] EWCA Civ 824, [2020] WLR(D) 380
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652309
Matters on return of case from ECJ
Arnold LJ
[2020] EWHC 1735 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652333
Challenge to proof of debt
ICC Judge Barber
[2020] EWHC 1737 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652331
Application by Swissport Fuelling Limited for the court’s sanction under section 899 of the Companies Act 2006 of a scheme of arrangement.
Mils J
[2020] EWHC 1773 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652322
Appeal by the defendant, CCC, against an order containing a final injunction restraining the defendant from publishing or disclosing to any other persons all or any part of the information contained in Confidential Schedule 1 to the order.
Lord Justice Patten
[2020] EWCA Civ 846
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652307
Mr Justice Birss
[2020] EWHC 1696 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652327
Insolvency and Companies Court Judge Jones
[2020] EWHC 1751 (Ch)
Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652325
Reasons for allowing appeal from refusal of adoption order
Mr Justice Keehan
[2020] EWCA Civ 797
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652315
[1940] 1 KB 342
England and Wales
Approved – Bonnington Castings Ltd v Wardlaw HL 1-Mar-1956
The injury of which the employee complained came from two sources, a pneumatic hammer, in respect of which the employers were not in breach of the relevant Regulations; and swing grinders, in respect of which they were in breach.
Held: It had . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652301
Birss J
[2020] EWHC 1792 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652329
[1946] 1 All ER 139
England and Wales
Cited – Bonnington Castings Ltd v Wardlaw HL 1-Mar-1956
The injury of which the employee complained came from two sources, a pneumatic hammer, in respect of which the employers were not in breach of the relevant Regulations; and swing grinders, in respect of which they were in breach.
Held: It had . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652299
Application by the First to Third Defendants for general civil restraint orders against the Fourth and the Fifth Defendants.
Mr David Halpern QC
[2020] EWHC 1804 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652328
action for breach of statutory duty against Lloyds Bank plc – conduct by Lloyds Bank plc of a review process that was agreed between the Financial Services Authority and Lloyds Bank plc in June 2012, and later updated in 2013. The review process concerned the mis-selling of certain types of interest rate hedging products to unsophisticated customers.
Sarah Worthington QC (Hon) sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge
[2020] EWHC 1758 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652326
The Court considered the scope of the licensing requirement and the consequences of failing to comply with it. Must a landlord be licensed to serve a notice under section 8 of the Housing Act 1988 (‘the 1988 Act’)? If he must, is a notice served by an unlicensed landlord nugatory?
Lord Justice Newey
[2020] EWCA Civ 854
Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652312
The Council had sought to withdraw care proceedings. The Court gave guidance o the differing practice where the threshold for making an order was met or not.
Flaux and Baker LJJ
[2020] EWCA Civ 848, [2020] WLR(D) 389
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652310
Third in a rapid succession of Court of Appeal cases concerning the effect of the automatic stay imposed by Practice Direction 51Z
Sir Geoffrey Vos, Chancellor of the High Court
[2020] EWCA Civ 833
Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 2) (Coronavirus) Rules 2020
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652316
Though a judge’s good character direction may be deficient the conviction may yet be safe.
[2007] EWCA Crim 704
England and Wales
Cited – Moustakim, Regina v CACD 27-Nov-2008
Appeal from conviction of being knowingly concerned in the fraudulent evasion of the prohibition on the importation of a controlled drug of Class A, that is to say cocaine. Challenge to good character direction ‘You know from the officer that the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652306
[1952] 1 All ER 1013
England and Wales
Cited – Bonnington Castings Ltd v Wardlaw HL 1-Mar-1956
The injury of which the employee complained came from two sources, a pneumatic hammer, in respect of which the employers were not in breach of the relevant Regulations; and swing grinders, in respect of which they were in breach.
Held: It had . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652300
The claimant wished to claim professional negligence against the defendants her former solicitors, saying that they had failed to have items of jewelry professionally valued on her divorce. She now appealed from an order striking out the claim as time barred.
Lord Justice McCombe
[2020] EWCA Civ 851
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652311
Application to have judgment set aside – sexual assault
[2019] EWHC 3722 (QB)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652252
VAT – input tax – whether HMRC acted unreasonably to refuse alternative evidence in absence of VAT invoice -no – evidence of zero rating for export – no – whether unexplained bank payment subject to VAT – yes
[2020] UKFTT 254 (TC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652288
‘The Solicitor General in this matter applies for permission to bring committal proceedings against the respondent, John Holmes, for interfering with the administration of justice in criminal proceedings in Northampton Crown Court on 1 October 2018. The Solicitor General seeks Mr Holmes’ committal to prison for using his mobile telephone while he and other co-defendants were in the secured dock in that courtroom in order to film for approximately 15 seconds.’
Simler LJ
[2019] EWHC 3765 (QB)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652255
Whether to make civil restraint order, and complaint of contempt of court.
Lavender J
[2019] EWHC 3686 (QB)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652251
Ryanair sought an injunction preventing the British Airline Pilots’ Association from calling strike action amongst Ryanair’s pilot employees who are members of BALPA.
[2019] EWHC 3882 (QB)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652249
VAT – hardship application – insufficient evidence of hardship – application refused
[2020] UKFTT 262 (TC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652292
Appeal against a judgment refusing to grant the Appellant a declaration that a length of grass verge adjoining a lane in Farnham, Surrey is not a highway or part of a highway subject to public rights of way.
Andrews DBE J
[2019] EWHC 3560 (QB)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652253
The contempt alleged is disobedience to an injunction which has been in place now for 26 years that prohibits the publication of information about the new identities of Jon Venables and Robert Thompson.
[2019] EWHC 3726 (QB)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652244
application for referral to Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) under paragraph 45 of Schedule 10 Finance Act 2003 – refused
[2020] UKFTT 242 (TC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652296
VAT-Appeal against assessment-Zero-rating of goods on the basis that they were acquired in another Member State by a person liable for VAT on the acquisition-Requirements for zero rating not met-Whether Appellant required to account for the VAT
[2020] UKFTT 252 (TC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652293
Challenge to terms of funding agreement.
[2020] EWHC 1616 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652230
Kerr J
[2020] EWHC 1746 (Admin)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652243
Matters arising from directions hearing
Mrs Justice Eady
[2019] EWHC 3588 (QB)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652254
[2020] EWCOP 31
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652192
Lord Justice Hickinbottom
[2020] EWHC 1753 (Admin)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652242
Post judgment issues
[2020] EWHC 1686 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652229
[2020] EWCOP 32
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652193
Roth J
[2020] EWHC 1727 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652231
VAT-Appeal against assessment in respect of disallowed input tax-Whether supplies had been paid for within 6 months or at all (s 26A VATA)-Whether input tax should have been allowed in the absence of a VAT invoice (reg 29 VAT Regulations)
[2020] UKFTT 251 (TC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652294
Renewed application for permission to challenge the decision of the Crown Prosecution Service not to prosecute two people for offences of fraud and for an offence of conspiracy to defraud. The applicant contends that this decision was perverse to the extent that no reasonable prosecutor could have reached it.
Mrs Justice Cutts DBE
[2020] EWHC 1760 (Admin)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652240
[2020] UKFTT 187 (TC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.651562
Penalty
[2020] UKFTT 185 (TC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.651564
INCOME TAX – directions to recover PAYE income tax from individuals – whether Appellants were aware that employer had wilfully failed to deduct PAYE – whether 20 year extended time limit for assessments applied – Regulation 72, Income Tax (PAYE) Regulations 2003
[2020] UKFTT 193 (TC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.651565
VAT – DIY Builders – planning permission for house and garage – house occupied 2010 – planning permission amended 3 January 2019 to omit garage – completion certificate issued 4 January 2019 – application for refund dated 4 January 2019 rejected by HMRC as out of time – appeal allowed as building project not completed until amended planning permission issued
[2020] UKFTT 173 (TC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.651561
Housing Benefit – Allowed
[2020] UKUT 80 (AAC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652180
Appeal from refusal of interim injunction in patent infringement allegation.
[2020] EWCA Civ 793
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652154
First-tier Tribunal’s failure to make a decision – defence of reasonable excuse
[2020] UKUT 207 (LC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652177
Accurate written summary of the history of the appellant’s awards
[2020] UKUT 79 (AAC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652181
Income Support
[2020] UKUT 145 (AAC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652182
The Claimant sued the Council for breach of the Data Protection Act 1998, breach of the General Data Protection Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2016/679), breach of confidence, misuse of private information, and breach of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Disclosure of medical records to attendees of child protection conference. Defendant’s application for relief – failure to Act for coronavirus crisis.
[2020] EWHC 1622 (QB)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652149
Allowed
[2020] UKUT 158 (AAC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652179
[2020] EWCOP 26
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652191
The decision of the First-tier Tribunal did not involve the making of an error on a
point of law under section 12 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007.
[2020] UKUT 152 (AAC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652185
[2020] EWHC 1656 (Admin)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652146
[2020] EWHC 1674 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652124
[2020] EWHC 1675 (Admin)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.652114
[2020] UKAITUR PA081772019
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.650073
[2020] UKAITUR PA016492019
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.649561
[2020] UKAITUR HU074332019
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.649305
[2020] UKAITUR HU015332019
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.648952
[2019] UKAITUR PA123992018
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.640789
Lord Justice Green
[2019] EWCA Crim 1632, [2019] WLR(D) 551, [2019] 4 WLR 147, [2020] 1 Cr App R (S) 41
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.642606
Schedule 36 Finance Act 2008 – notice to provide detailed chronological directors’ loan account -penalty – whether reasonable excuse for failure to comply – no
[2019] UKFTT 553 (TC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.641336
Capital gains tax – Payment under a guarantee in respect of loan to company – Whether allowable loss – Whether ‘qualifying loan’ – Whether company commenced trading – Appeal allowed
[2019] UKFTT 515 (TC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.641326
Income tax – penalty for late filing of returns – late appeal – permission to appeal late – whether reasonable excuse – no – appeal discussed.
[2019] UKFTT 697 (TC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.646889
[2019] EWCOP 29
England and Wales
Cited – Imperial College Healthcare An NHS Trust v MB and Others CoP 12-Jul-2019
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.642836
[2019] UKFTT 536 (TC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.641325
[2019] UKFTT 539 (TC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.641334
Penalties for failure to file company tax returns – Schedule 18 Finance Act 1998 – taxpayer relied on agent to file returns – unaware returns had not been filed – whether reasonable excuse – no – appeal dismissed
[2019] UKFTT 535 (TC)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.641335
[2019] UKAITUR HU157482018
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.648308
[2019] UKAITUR HU175802018
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.646038
[2019] UKAITUR PA014182019
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.645685
[2019] UKAITUR HU243062018
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.645656
[2019] UKAITUR EA073352017
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.642174
[2019] UKAITUR HU016172019
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.640946
[2019] UKAITUR PA004732019
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.640727
[2019] UKAITUR PA035322018
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.640297
[2019] UKAITUR PA118972018
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.640001
[2019] UKAITUR PA044202018
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.639398
[2019] UKAITUR HU114442017
England and Wales
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.639376
Historic sexual abuse allegation – trial of limitation and abuse of process issues.
[2019] NIQB 2
Northern Ireland
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.636818
Challenge to refusal of inquest
[2019] NIQB 14
Northern Ireland
Updated: 31 December 2022; Ref: scu.636815