Click the case name for better results:

Sukran Aydin And Others v Turkey: ECHR 22 Jan 2013

ECHR Article 10-1Freedom of expressionConviction for having spoken non-official language during election campaigns: violationArticle 46Article 46-2Execution of judgmentMeasures of a general characterRespondent State required to reform the system of judicial disciplineFacts – The applicants, candidates in parliamentary and municipal elections, were convicted and sentenced to prison terms and fines for having spoken Kurdish during rallies, … Continue reading Sukran Aydin And Others v Turkey: ECHR 22 Jan 2013

Oleksandr Volkov v Ukraine: ECHR 9 Jan 2013

ECHR Article 6Civil proceedingsArticle 6-1Impartial tribunalIndependent tribunalStructural defects of the system of judicial discipline: violationFair hearingAbsence of limitation period for imposing disciplinary penalty on judges and abuse of electronic vote system in Parliament when adopting decision on judge’s dismissal: violationsTribunal established by lawComposition of chamber examining applicant’s case defined by a judge whose term of … Continue reading Oleksandr Volkov v Ukraine: ECHR 9 Jan 2013

Ibrahim Gurkan v Turkey: ECHR 3 Jul 2012

Citations: 10987/10 (Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)), [2012] ECHR 1367 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Citing: Cited – Ibrahim Gurkan v Turkey (CLIN) ECHR 3-Jul-2012 ECHR Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Impartial tribunal Independent tribunal Participation of serving military officer in military criminal court: violation Facts – . … Continue reading Ibrahim Gurkan v Turkey: ECHR 3 Jul 2012

Eweida And Others v The United Kingdom: ECHR 15 Jan 2013

ECHR Article 9-1 Manifest religion or belief Disciplinary measures against employees for wearing religious symbols (cross) at work or refusing to perform duties they considered incompatible with their religious beliefs: violation; no violations Article 14 Discrimination Disciplinary measures against employees for wearing religious symbols (cross) at work or refusing to perform duties they considered incompatible … Continue reading Eweida And Others v The United Kingdom: ECHR 15 Jan 2013

Karabet And Others v Ukraine: ECHR 17 Jan 2013

ECHR Article 3TortureEffective investigationLarge-scale violence against prisoners to punish them for peaceful hunger strike and absence of effective investigation: violationsFacts – In January 2007 the applicants, who were all serving prison sentences, took part in a hunger strike with other prisoners to protest about their conditions of detention. A week later the prison authorities conducted … Continue reading Karabet And Others v Ukraine: ECHR 17 Jan 2013

Legillon v France: ECHR 10 Jan 2013

ECHR Article 6Criminal proceedingsArticle 6-1Criminal chargeFair hearingAssize court judgment containing statement of reasons for jury’s guilty verdict: violation; no violation[This summary also covers the judgment in the case of Agnelet v. France, no. 61198/08, 10 January 2013]Facts – In Agnelet, the applicant was sentenced in 2007 by the Assize Court to twenty years’ imprisonment for … Continue reading Legillon v France: ECHR 10 Jan 2013

N (Kenya) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 5 Aug 2004

The appellant a foreign national, had been convicted of very serious sex offences, and as his sentence came to an end was ordered to be deported. He appealed saying this infringed his right to a family life. Held: The court had to balance the public revulsion at his crimes with the need for compassion. The … Continue reading N (Kenya) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 5 Aug 2004

Bucur And Toma v Romania: ECHR 8 Jan 2013

ECHR Article 10-1Freedom to impart informationCriminal conviction for making public irregular telephone tapping procedures: violationFacts – The first applicant worked in the telephone communications surveillance and recording department of a military unit of the Romanian Intelligence Service (RIS). In the course of his work he came across a number of irregularities. In addition, the telephones … Continue reading Bucur And Toma v Romania: ECHR 8 Jan 2013

Claes v Belgium: ECHR 10 Jan 2013

ECHR Article 3Degrading treatmentStructural problems resulting in prisoner suffering from mental disorders being held for more than fifteen years in prison psychiatric wing with no hope of change or appropriate medical care: violationFacts – In February 1978 a Criminal Court judgment ruled that the applicant, who had raped his underage sisters, was not criminally responsible … Continue reading Claes v Belgium: ECHR 10 Jan 2013

AK and L v Croatia: ECHR 8 Jan 2013

ECHR Article 8-1 Respect for family life Authorities’ failure to ensure legal representation of mentally disabled applicant in proceedings divesting her of parental rights and to inform her of adoption proceedings in respect of her son: violation Facts – The first applicant is the mother of the second applicant L., who was born in 2008. … Continue reading AK and L v Croatia: ECHR 8 Jan 2013

Agnelet v France: ECHR 10 Jan 2013

Article 6Criminal proceedingsArticle 6-1Criminal chargeFair hearingAssize court judgment containing statement of reasons for jury’s guilty verdict: violation; no violation[This summary also covers the judgment in the case of Legillon v. France, no. 53406/10, 10 January 2013]Facts – In Agnelet, the applicant was sentenced in 2007 by the Assize Court to twenty years’ imprisonment for murder. … Continue reading Agnelet v France: ECHR 10 Jan 2013

Ashby Donald And Others v France: ECHR 10 Jan 2013

ECHR Article 10-1Freedom of expressionConviction of photographers for copyright infringement through publication on the Internet of photographs of fashion show: no violationARTICLE 10Freedom of expressionno violationFacts – The applicants are fashion photographers. Accredited by the French designers’ federation Federation francaise de la couture for different fashion publications, they were invited by various fashion houses to … Continue reading Ashby Donald And Others v France: ECHR 10 Jan 2013

Anderson v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 18 Feb 2013

FTTTx INCOME TAX – Appeal against amendment made by a closure notice – Whether Tribunal has the power to allow an appeal on grounds that the application of the law in the circumstances of the particular case would be manifestly unreasonable and unjust and would not achieve the purposes of the legislation – European Convention … Continue reading Anderson v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 18 Feb 2013

J1 v Secretary of State for The Home Department: CA 27 Mar 2013

The applicant said that his proposed deportation to Ethiopia would infringe his article 3 rights, and in particular whether SIAC was entitled to conclude that assurances given by the Ethiopian Government were a satisfactory safeguard, even though not all the arrangements for monitoring fulfilment of those assurances were in place. Judges: Jackson, Elias, Treacy LJJ … Continue reading J1 v Secretary of State for The Home Department: CA 27 Mar 2013

Valiuliene v Lithuania: ECHR 26 Mar 2013

Citations: 33234/07 – HEJUD, [2013] ECHR 240 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Citing: Legal Summary – Valiuliene v Lithuania (LS) ECHR 26-Mar-2013 ECHR Article 3Degrading treatmentInhuman treatmentEffective investigationInvestigative and procedural flaws resulting in prosecution of domestic-violence case becoming time-barred: . . Lists of cited by and citing cases may … Continue reading Valiuliene v Lithuania: ECHR 26 Mar 2013

Ismail v Secretary of State for Home Department: Admn 26 Mar 2013

The court was asked as to the extent of the Secretary of State’s discretion and obligation to consider a person’s Article 6 rights when requested personally to serve a judgment of an overseas court pursuant to a request for mutual legal assistance from the government of the country of that overseas court. The Claimant said … Continue reading Ismail v Secretary of State for Home Department: Admn 26 Mar 2013

A, Regina (on The Application of) v Lowestoft Magistrates’ Court: Admn 26 Mar 2013

A had pleaded guilty to a charge of being drunk in a public place, while having the charge of a child under the age of 7 years, contrary to section 2(1) of the Licensing Act 1902. The child in question was A’s daughter, to whom I shall refer as B. B was 2 and a … Continue reading A, Regina (on The Application of) v Lowestoft Magistrates’ Court: Admn 26 Mar 2013

Lord Carlile of Berriew and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for The Home Department: CA 20 Mar 2013

The applicants complained of the refusal of a visitors permit by the respondent to an eminent Iranian dissident. Held: The appeal was dismissed. Although the decision was an interference in the human rights of the applicants, that intereference had been supported by clear justification. Judges: Arden, Patten, McCombe LJJ Citations: [2013] EWCA Civ 199 Links: … Continue reading Lord Carlile of Berriew and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for The Home Department: CA 20 Mar 2013

Brovin And Others v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 3 – Prohibition of torture : Third Section Committee Citations: 42504/17, [2022] ECHR 841 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 14 November 2022; Ref: scu.681651

Myshchyshyn v Ukraine: ECHR 6 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 6 – Right to a fair trial : Fifth Section Committee Citations: 41557/13, [2022] ECHR 772 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 14 November 2022; Ref: scu.681711

Vinter, Bamber And Moore v The United Kingdom: ECHR 17 Jan 2012

The prisoners appealed saying that the whole life terms set on the imposition of a life sentence for murder were a breach of their human rights. Held: The continued detention of three defendants who had been made subject to a whole life tariff did not violate Article 3 because the ‘requirements of punishment and deterrence … Continue reading Vinter, Bamber And Moore v The United Kingdom: ECHR 17 Jan 2012

X And Others v Austria: ECHR 19 Feb 2013

Grand Chamber – The applicants alleged that they had been discriminated against in comparison with different-sex couples, as second-parent adoption was legally impossible for a same-sex couple. Held: An applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred … Continue reading X And Others v Austria: ECHR 19 Feb 2013

Izuazu (Article 8 – New Rules) Nigeria: UTIAC 30 Jan 2013

UTIAC 1. In cases to which the new Immigration Rules introduced as from 9 July 2012 by HC 194 apply, judges should proceed by first considering whether a claimant is able to benefit under the applicable provisions of the Immigration Rules designed to address Article 8 claims. Where the claimant does not meet the requirements … Continue reading Izuazu (Article 8 – New Rules) Nigeria: UTIAC 30 Jan 2013

Bakhayev And Others v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 3 – Prohibition of torture : Third Section Committee Citations: 4806/18, [2022] ECHR 855 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 14 November 2022; Ref: scu.681639

Saloidy And Others v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 5 – Right to liberty and security : Third Section Committee Citations: 4973/18, [2022] ECHR 856 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 14 November 2022; Ref: scu.681737

Steer v Stormsure Ltd (Sex Discrimination, Human Rights): EAT 21 Dec 2020

The Appellant has presented a claim in the Employment Tribunal in which she alleges that she was dismissed by the Respondent and that the dismissal amounted to sex discrimination and/or victimisation on the ground that she had done a protected act, contrary to the Equality Act 2010. She appeals against the Employment Tribunal’s refusal to … Continue reading Steer v Stormsure Ltd (Sex Discrimination, Human Rights): EAT 21 Dec 2020

Al-Khawaja v The United Kingdom; Tahery v The United Kingdom: ECHR 15 Dec 2011

(Grand Chamber) The claimants complained of the use against them of hearsay evidence in their trials. Held: ‘the underlying principle is that the defendant in a criminal trial should have an effective opportunity to challenge the evidence against him. This principle requires not merely that the defendant should know the identity of his accusers so … Continue reading Al-Khawaja v The United Kingdom; Tahery v The United Kingdom: ECHR 15 Dec 2011

Adeojo and Another v Regina: CACD 6 Feb 2013

The defendants appealed against their convictions for murder saying that the court should not have relied upon hearsay evidence. A witness had refused to give evidence, but his earlier evidnece was used. Held: The appeals failed. The judge had acted properly in that when considering the exercise of his judgment under section 78 of the … Continue reading Adeojo and Another v Regina: CACD 6 Feb 2013

Hill v Governing Body of Great Tey Primary School: EAT 29 Jan 2013

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL/POLKEY DEDUCTION/HUMAN RIGHTSA school mid-day dinner assistant told a child’s parents that the child had been tied to a railing in the playground and whipped across the legs by other pupils. She was suspended, She complained to the press about the suspension and in doing so confirmed what she had told the parents. … Continue reading Hill v Governing Body of Great Tey Primary School: EAT 29 Jan 2013

Horvath And Kiss v Hungary: ECHR 29 Jan 2013

ECHR The case concerned the complaints of two young men of Roma origin that their education in schools for the mentally disabled had been the result of misplacement and had amounted to discrimination. Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 (right to education) read in conjunction with Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination)The Court underlined … Continue reading Horvath And Kiss v Hungary: ECHR 29 Jan 2013

Kevin Fox v United Kingdom: ECHR 20 Mar 2012

The claimant said that he had been severely assaulted by police officers when being arrested. He had been ‘tasered’ four times at least. The taser had been applied directly to the skin, rater than from a distance, and psychiatrist compared it to ‘extreme electro-convulsive therapy’. He was refused judicial review after the police investigation of … Continue reading Kevin Fox v United Kingdom: ECHR 20 Mar 2012

Selmouni v France: ECHR 25 Nov 1996

Citations: [1996] ECHR 100, 25803/94 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights 3 Cited by: Cited – Selmouni v France ECHR 28-Jul-1999 Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion); Violation of Art. 3; Violation of Art. 6-1; Non-pecuniary damage – financial award; Costs and expenses award – . .Cited – Selmouni … Continue reading Selmouni v France: ECHR 25 Nov 1996

Selmouni v France: ECHR 3 Dec 2009

Execution of judgment Citations: [2009] ECHR 2250, 25803/94, [2009] ECHR 2250 Links: Bailii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights 3 Citing: Cited – Selmouni v France ECHR 25-Nov-1996 . . Judgment – Selmouni v France ECHR 28-Jul-1999 Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion); Violation of Art. 3; Violation of Art. … Continue reading Selmouni v France: ECHR 3 Dec 2009

Giuseppina And Orestina Procaccini v Italy: ECHR 29 Mar 2006

The complainants said that the damages awarded for the delay in hearing their civil case were derisory. Judges: L Wildhaber, P Citations: [2006] ECHR 274 Links: Worldlii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Citing: Cited – Giuseppina And Orestina Procaccini v Italy ECHR 10-Nov-2004 ECHR (French Text) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) – Preliminary … Continue reading Giuseppina And Orestina Procaccini v Italy: ECHR 29 Mar 2006

Bayatyan v Armenia: ECHR 7 Jul 2011

(Grand Chamber) The applicant was a practising Jehovah’s Witness and a conscientious objector. He said that his conviction for refusing to serve in the army had violated his right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. That complaint had been rejected. Held: (Gyulumyan dissenting) There had been a violation of the applicant’s article 9 rights. … Continue reading Bayatyan v Armenia: ECHR 7 Jul 2011

Chernozub v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 5 – Right to liberty and security : Third Section Committee Citations: 8777/12, [2022] ECHR 823 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 13 November 2022; Ref: scu.681656

Samigulliny And Others v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 6 – Right to a fair trial : Third Section Committee Citations: 61463/14, [2022] ECHR 827 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 13 November 2022; Ref: scu.681738

Pogoryelov v Ukraine: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 5 – Right to liberty and security : Fifth Section Committee Citations: 19062/15, [2022] ECHR 829 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 13 November 2022; Ref: scu.681727

P, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Admn 11 Dec 2003

The applicant was a discretionary life prisoner compulsorily detained in a mental hospital. His tariff had now expired. If not detained under the 1983 Act he would now be entitled to a review. He argued that there should be a joint hearing. Held: There is no necessary breach of the requirement of a speedy hearing … Continue reading P, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Admn 11 Dec 2003

Ramirez Sanchez v France: ECHR 2 Dec 2010

(Execution of Judgment) Record of satisfaction of judgment against it by the respondent. Judges: L Wildhaber P Citations: [2010] ECHR 2241 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights 3 Citing: See Also – Ramirez Sanchez v France ECHR 27-Jan-2005 The applicant complained that he had been held in solitary confinement for a period of … Continue reading Ramirez Sanchez v France: ECHR 2 Dec 2010

Enea v Italy: ECHR 17 Sep 2009

(Grand Chamber) The applicant, a prisoner serving a long sentence for Mafia-type criminal offences, was subjected to a special regime by ministerial decrees. The restrictions included not only very limited family visits but also a long period (seemingly about three years) in a special form of high-security unit which involved separation from prisoners in other … Continue reading Enea v Italy: ECHR 17 Sep 2009

SR v The Netherlands (Dec): ECHR 18 Sep 2012

ECHR Article 5 Article 5-4 Review of lawfulness of detention Supreme Court decision declaring appeal inadmissible but nevertheless addressing the merits: inadmissible Article 5-1-e Persons of unsound mind Court order for admission to psychiatric hospital for observation owing to concerns about applicant’s mental state: inadmissible Facts – In July 2006 a public prosecutor submitted a … Continue reading SR v The Netherlands (Dec): ECHR 18 Sep 2012

Egmez v Cyprus (Dec): ECHR 18 Sep 2012

ECHR Article 35-3 Ratione materiae Complaint relating to implementation of previous European Court judgment and raising no new facts: inadmissible Facts – In a judgment of 21 December 2000,* the Court found that the applicant in the present case had been ill-treated contrary to Article 3, and that there had been a breach of Article … Continue reading Egmez v Cyprus (Dec): ECHR 18 Sep 2012

Al Nashiri v Poland: ECHR 10 Jul 2012

ECHR Article 3 Torture Alleged complicity in practice of rendition of persons to secret detention sites at which illegal interrogation methods were employed: communicated Effective investigation Alleged failure to acknowledge and investigate details of ill-treatment and enforced disappearance: communicated [This summary also covers the communicated case of Al Nashiri v. Romania, no. 33234/12.] The applicant, … Continue reading Al Nashiri v Poland: ECHR 10 Jul 2012

Arkhipov And Others v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 3 – Prohibition of torture : Third Section Committee Citations: 26454/13, [2022] ECHR 825 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 12 November 2022; Ref: scu.681636

Britvin And Others v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 5 – Right to liberty and security : Third Section Committee Citations: 2113/20, [2022] ECHR 881 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 12 November 2022; Ref: scu.681650

Sengul And Others v Turkiye: ECHR 18 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 – Protection of property : Second Section Committee Citations: 10596/13, [2022] ECHR 898 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 12 November 2022; Ref: scu.681864

Kosarev And Others v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 5 – Right to liberty and security : Third Section Committee Citations: 2102/20, [2022] ECHR 880 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 11 November 2022; Ref: scu.681688

Bouton v France: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 10 – Freedom of expression-{general} : Fifth Section Citations: 22636/19, [2022] ECHR 820 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 11 November 2022; Ref: scu.681648

Czeszel v Poland: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 5 – Right to liberty and security : First Section Committee Citations: 47731/19, [2022] ECHR 877 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 11 November 2022; Ref: scu.681663

Gunnerside Estates Limited v Terence Milner, Cynthia Mary Milner (Easements): LRA 18 Aug 2010

LRA An application to cancel a unilateral notice in respect of shooting rights on the basis that such rights interfered with the registered proprietors’ human rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 1 of the First Protocol. Human rights found to have no relevance to the question of cancellation, … Continue reading Gunnerside Estates Limited v Terence Milner, Cynthia Mary Milner (Easements): LRA 18 Aug 2010

Stugarev And Others v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 3 – Prohibition of torture : Third Section Committee Citations: 72087/17, [2022] ECHR 847 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 10 November 2022; Ref: scu.681747

Bezrukov v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 5 – Right to liberty and security : Third Section Committee Citations: 76344/12, [2022] ECHR 824 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 10 November 2022; Ref: scu.681643

Brewster, Re Judicial Review: QBNI 9 Nov 2012

The applicant challenged the decision of the respondent Northern Ireland Local Government Officers’ Superannuation Committee (‘NILGOSC’) made on 1 July 2011, by which it declined to pay a survivor’s pension to the applicant following the death of her co-habiting partner. She argued that the absolute requirement of nomination imposed on unmarried partners as a condition … Continue reading Brewster, Re Judicial Review: QBNI 9 Nov 2012

Gaughran, Re Judicial Review: QBNI 13 Nov 2012

The claimant sought judicial review of the refusal by the Police Service of Northern Ireland to remove records of his fingerprint, a photograph and DNA sample and profiles which had been collected when he was stopped on suspicion of driving wih excess alcohol. Though later convicted, he said that the retention of these items was … Continue reading Gaughran, Re Judicial Review: QBNI 13 Nov 2012

Re Erskine 1948 Trust: ChD 29 Mar 2012

The trust was created in 1948, and provided gifts over, which had now failed. The court considered the construction of the term ‘stautory next of kin’. The possible beneficiaries claimed through being adopted, arguing that at the date of the last beneficary’s death, all impediments to inheritance by adopted children had been removed by statute. … Continue reading Re Erskine 1948 Trust: ChD 29 Mar 2012

Matskevich v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 5 – Right to liberty and security : Third Section Committee Citations: 25622/21, [2022] ECHR 892 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 09 November 2022; Ref: scu.681705

Yegorov And Karavayev v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 5 – Right to liberty and security : Third Section Committee Citations: 50194/20, [2022] ECHR 889 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 09 November 2022; Ref: scu.681762

Kokunov And Others v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 5 – Right to liberty and security : Third Section Committee Citations: 54172/20, [2022] ECHR 890 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 09 November 2022; Ref: scu.681685

Pimenova And Others v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 5 – Right to liberty and security : Third Section Committee Citations: 24963/20, [2022] ECHR 883 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 09 November 2022; Ref: scu.681725

Kozhakhmetovy And Others v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 8 – Right to respect for private and family life : Third Section Committee Citations: 7072/14, [2022] ECHR 826 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 09 November 2022; Ref: scu.681690

Ponkratenko v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 3 – Prohibition of torture : Third Section Committee Citations: 27314/20, [2022] ECHR 885 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 09 November 2022; Ref: scu.681729

JK, Regina (on The Application of) v The Secretary of State for The Home Department and Another: Admn 20 Apr 2015

JK a transgender (M-F) was biological father to two children sought the right to be described on the birth register as parent Judges: Mr Justice Hickinbottom Citations: [2015] EWHC 990 (Admin), [2015] 2 FCR 131, [2015] HRLR 10, [2016] 1 All ER 354 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights 8 14, Births and … Continue reading JK, Regina (on The Application of) v The Secretary of State for The Home Department and Another: Admn 20 Apr 2015

Cherkasov And Bykov v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 3 – Prohibition of torture : Third Section Committee Citations: 5673/21, [2022] ECHR 891 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 07 November 2022; Ref: scu.681655

Khuren-Ool And Others v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 8 – Right to respect for private and family life : Third Section Committee Citations: 77300/17, [2022] ECHR 851 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 07 November 2022; Ref: scu.681683

Ulanin And Others v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 5 – Right to liberty and security : Third Section Committee Citations: 2376/20, [2022] ECHR 882 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 07 November 2022; Ref: scu.681756

Sobornov v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 5 – Right to liberty and security : Third Section Committee Citations: 32559/20, [2022] ECHR 888 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 07 November 2022; Ref: scu.681745

Kuimov v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 3 – Prohibition of torture : Third Section Committee Citations: 1796/20, [2022] ECHR 879 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 07 November 2022; Ref: scu.681695

Politayev And Others v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 3 – Prohibition of torture : Third Section Committee Citations: 62123/16, [2022] ECHR 836 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 07 November 2022; Ref: scu.681728

Gilev And Others v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 3 – Prohibition of torture : Third Section Committee Citations: 19504/19, [2022] ECHR 872 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 07 November 2022; Ref: scu.681670

Van Colle v The United Kingdom: ECHR 13 Nov 2012

Judges: Lech Garlicki, P Citations: 7678/09 – HEJUD, [2012] ECHR 1928, (2013) 56 EHRR 23 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Citing: See Also – Van Colle v Hertfordshire Police QBD 10-Mar-2006 The claimants claimed for the estate of their murdered son. He had been waiting to give evidence in … Continue reading Van Colle v The United Kingdom: ECHR 13 Nov 2012

Redfearn v The United Kingdom: ECHR 6 Nov 2012

The applicant alleged that his rights had been infringed by his dismissal from his post as driver transporting children and adults with physical and/or mental disabilities. He had stood for election as a candidate for the British National Party, a party then allowing only white nationals as members. The majority of his customers and a … Continue reading Redfearn v The United Kingdom: ECHR 6 Nov 2012

Corey, Re Judicial Review: QBNI 9 Jul 2012

C had been recalled from parole, and complained that the procedure had been unfair in that it had been almost entirely based upon closed materials. Held: The Commissioners’ decision was indeed based solely or decisively on the closed material. Moreover, the allegations contained in the open material were not sufficiently specific to enable the appellant … Continue reading Corey, Re Judicial Review: QBNI 9 Jul 2012

Stolbovskikh v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 3 – Prohibition of torture : Third Section Committee Citations: 77444/17, [2022] ECHR 852 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 06 November 2022; Ref: scu.681746

Gabidullin And Others v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 5 – Right to liberty and security : Third Section Committee Citations: 34253/18, [2022] ECHR 863 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 06 November 2022; Ref: scu.681668

Chichin And Others v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 5 – Right to liberty and security : Third Section Committee Citations: 27564/19, [2022] ECHR 874 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 06 November 2022; Ref: scu.681657

Breshchanov And Others v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 3 – Prohibition of torture : Third Section Committee Citations: 33120/08, [2022] ECHR 821 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 06 November 2022; Ref: scu.681649

Parkhomenko And Others v Ukraine: ECHR 6 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 6 – Right to a fair trial : Fifth Section Committee Citations: 13422/21, [2022] ECHR 797 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 06 November 2022; Ref: scu.681719

Belyanskiy And Others v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 5 – Right to liberty and security : Third Section Committee Citations: 65026/16, [2022] ECHR 837 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 06 November 2022; Ref: scu.681641

Mayakov v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 5 – Right to liberty and security : Third Section Committee Citations: 28295/20, [2022] ECHR 886 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 06 November 2022; Ref: scu.681706

Bantysh And Others v Ukraine: ECHR 6 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 6 – Right to a fair trial : Fifth Section Committee Citations: 13063/18, [2022] ECHR 790 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 06 November 2022; Ref: scu.681640

Pidgurskiy v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 3 – Prohibition of torture : Third Section Committee Citations: 53624/18, [2022] ECHR 867 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 06 November 2022; Ref: scu.681724

Kara-Murza v Russia: ECHR 4 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 – Right to free elections-{general} : Third Section Citations: 2513/14, [2022] ECHR 754 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 06 November 2022; Ref: scu.681680

Teplov v Russia: ECHR 13 Oct 2022

ECHR Judgment : Article 3 – Prohibition of torture : Third Section Committee Citations: 69176/17, [2022] ECHR 845 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 06 November 2022; Ref: scu.681752

In re E (Minors) (Residence Orders: Imposition of Conditions): CA 30 Apr 1997

A residence order can not be accompanied by an order as to where a parent with care must live in the UK or with whom. An appeal may well arise in which a disappointed applicant will contend that section 13(1)(b) of the Children Act 1989 imposes a disproportionate restriction on a parent’s right to determine … Continue reading In re E (Minors) (Residence Orders: Imposition of Conditions): CA 30 Apr 1997

Cases Of De Wilde, Ooms And Versyp (‘Vagrancy’) v Belgium (Article 50): ECHR 10 Mar 1972

Citations: 2899/66, [1972] ECHR 1, 2832/66, 2835/66 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Citing: See Also – In re De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v Belgium (No 1) ECHR 18-Nov-1970 The applicants had been detained under Belgian vagrancy laws. An earlier decision had found that their rights had been infringed because of the … Continue reading Cases Of De Wilde, Ooms And Versyp (‘Vagrancy’) v Belgium (Article 50): ECHR 10 Mar 1972

Smith and Others v The Ministry of Defence: CA 19 Oct 2012

The mother of a soldier claimed after he had died in an attack while serving in Iraq. She asserted that if he had had proper equipment his life would not have been. Held: Claims arising from the deaths of soldiers on active service abroad alleging breach of the right to life in article 2 of … Continue reading Smith and Others v The Ministry of Defence: CA 19 Oct 2012

AAM (A Child) v Secretary of State for The Home Department: QBD 27 Sep 2012

The claimant sought damages, alleging false imprisonment and breach of article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The defendant conceded that the detention had been unlawful because officers had wrongly applied a presumption that an asylum seeker who arrived clandestinely should be detained, but disputed that other grounds on which the claimant alleged … Continue reading AAM (A Child) v Secretary of State for The Home Department: QBD 27 Sep 2012

Buckland v The United Kingdom: ECHR 18 Sep 2012

The applicant alleged that the Court of Appeal’s decision to dismiss her appeal and uphold the judgment making a possession order constituted an unjustified breach of her right to respect for her home and her family life and discriminated against her, in violation of Article 8 taken alone and in conjunction with Article 14. Held: … Continue reading Buckland v The United Kingdom: ECHR 18 Sep 2012