The claimant sought relief from sanctions. He had served statement summaries rather than, as ordered, the statements themselves.
Judges:
Warby J
Citations:
[2019] EWHC 346 (QB)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
See Also – Otuo v The Watch Tower Bible And Tract Society of Britain (Relief from Sanctions 1) QBD 21-Feb-2019
Defendants’ application pursuant to CPR 3.9 for relief from sanctions, in respect of their non-compliance within Order. The defendants had made an application raising the question of whether the entirety of these slander claims, or aspects of them, . .
See Also – Otuo v The Watch Tower Bible And Tract Society of Britain (Non Justiciability and Reply) QBD 21-Feb-2019
The defendants argued that the claims against them were non-justiciable, requiring the court to resolve issues of religious faith, doctrine or practice, which are matters which it is not institutionally competent to do. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Litigation Practice, Defamation
Updated: 21 June 2022; Ref: scu.634249