Defendants’ application pursuant to CPR 3.9 for relief from sanctions, in respect of their non-compliance within Order. The defendants had made an application raising the question of whether the entirety of these slander claims, or aspects of them, should be stayed or struck out on the grounds that the issues raised are not justiciable
Judges:
Warby J
Citations:
[2019] EWHC 341 (QB)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – Otuo v The Watch Tower Bible And Tract Society of Britain (Relief from Sanctions 2) QBD 21-Feb-2019
The claimant sought relief from sanctions. He had served statement summaries rather than, as ordered, the statements themselves. . .
Cited by:
See Also – Otuo v The Watch Tower Bible And Tract Society of Britain (Non Justiciability and Reply) QBD 21-Feb-2019
The defendants argued that the claims against them were non-justiciable, requiring the court to resolve issues of religious faith, doctrine or practice, which are matters which it is not institutionally competent to do. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Litigation Practice, Defamation
Updated: 21 June 2022; Ref: scu.634250