EAT REVIEW
The Claimant applied for a review of a judgment dated 2 November 2011, principally on the grounds of fresh evidence. The Employment Judge refused the application, and in any event refused to extend time for making it: see rule 35(1) and (3). For the most part his decision is upheld. However he refused one aspect of the application on the basis that the Claimant had supported it with forged documents. In this respect alone, the appeal is allowed: it was not appropriate, upon preliminary consideration of an application under rule 35(3), for the Employment Judge to decide on paper a disputed question of fact as to whether documents were forged.
Judges:
Richardson J
Citations:
[2012] UKEAT 0001 – 12 – 1405
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Employment
Updated: 03 November 2022; Ref: scu.462308