EAT Whether the Employment Tribunal was entitled to refuse to order an applicant to pay costs to a respondent (i) after they had found that his claim was ‘misconceived’ (ii) after the Employment Tribunal had previously warned him that his ‘claim is misconceived and may have no reasonable prospect of success’ and (iii) the respondent knew that his claim was misconceived.
Judges:
Silber J
Citations:
[2005] UKEAT 0842 – 04 – 2303
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Employment
Updated: 07 February 2022; Ref: scu.224722