EAT PRACTICE and PROCEDURE: APPELLATE JURISDICTION/REASONS/ BURNS-BARKE
UNFAIR DISMISSAL: COMPENSATION
PRACTICE and PROCEDURE: COSTS
Appeal in respect of the award by the Tribunal of andpound;3,000 costs, and cross-appeal in respect of the calculation of future loss of andpound;35,700 both allowed, because the Tribunal had failed to give any adequate explanation of these awards, and in particular how the figures were arrived at. A further point arose during the hearing before the Appeal Tribunal, as to which there appeared to be no authority – that is whether on remission to a Tribunal to reconsider the award in respect of future loss it should have regard to circumstances as they were at the time of making the decision appealed from, or whether it should have regard to circumstances as they will be on the date the remitted case is determined by it. It was held that the latter is the appropriate course.
Citations:
[2010] UKEAT 0147 – 09 – 1501
Links:
Employment
Updated: 14 August 2022; Ref: scu.396732