Nabob of The Carnatic v The East India Company: 2 Jan 1789

A political treaty, between sovereigns, or parties exercising sovereign authority cannot be the subject of a municipal jurisdiction.

Citations:

[1789] EngR 1626, (1789-1817) 1 Ves Jun Supp 149, (1789) 34 ER 729

Links:

Commonlii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

See AlsoNabob of The Carnatic v The East India Company 1789
. .

Cited by:

See AlsoNabob of The Carnatic v The East India Company 1789
. .
See AlsoNabob of The Carnatic v East India Company 23-Jul-1791
. .
CitedBelhaj and Another v Straw and Others SC 17-Jan-2017
The claimant alleged complicity by the defendant, (now former) Foreign Secretary, in his mistreatment by the US while held in Libya. He also alleged involvement in his unlawful abduction and removal to Libya, from which had had fled for political . .
See AlsoNabob of The Carnatic v East India Company 28-Jan-1793
The case arose out of the East India Company’s controversial relations with the Nabob at a stage when the courts had not yet learned to identify the East India Company with the British government. The Company had assisted the Nabob, a sovereign . .
See AlsoGhoolam Moortoozah Khan Bahadoor v The Government, Representing The Estate Of The Late Nabob Of The Carnatic 15-Jun-1863
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Jurisdiction, Constitutional

Updated: 14 June 2022; Ref: scu.367257