Citations:
[1789] EngR 1625, (1789-1817) 1 Ves Jun Supp 223, (1789) 34 ER 761 (B)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – Nabob of The Carnatic v The East India Company 2-Jan-1789
A political treaty, between sovereigns, or parties exercising sovereign authority cannot be the subject of a municipal jurisdiction. . .
Cited by:
See Also – Nabob of The Carnatic v East India Company 23-Jul-1791
. .
See Also – Nabob of The Carnatic v The East India Company 2-Jan-1789
A political treaty, between sovereigns, or parties exercising sovereign authority cannot be the subject of a municipal jurisdiction. . .
See Also – Nabob of The Carnatic v East India Company 28-Jan-1793
The case arose out of the East India Company’s controversial relations with the Nabob at a stage when the courts had not yet learned to identify the East India Company with the British government. The Company had assisted the Nabob, a sovereign . .
See Also – Ghoolam Moortoozah Khan Bahadoor v The Government, Representing The Estate Of The Late Nabob Of The Carnatic 15-Jun-1863
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Litigation Practice
Updated: 14 June 2022; Ref: scu.367256