Mutton v Peat: 1899

Byrne J said that the rule in Clayton’s Case applies ‘as between cestuis que trust in an appropriate case’, but held that in the case before him Clayton’s Case did not apply because the bankers had specifically appropriated monies in a way inconsistent with it.

Judges:

Byrne J

Citations:

[1899] 2 Ch 556

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

Appeal fromMutton v Peat CA 1900
Held: The appeal succeeded. A bank’s customer has a right in general to call on the bank to combine his accounts. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Banking

Updated: 10 September 2022; Ref: scu.510902