Moore v The President of The Methodist Conference: EAT 15 Mar 2011

EAT JURISDICTIONAL POINTS – Worker, employee or neither
Claimant, a Methodist minister, brought proceedings for unfair dismissal – Tribunal held that it was bound by President of Methodist Church Conference v Parfitt [1984] ICR 176 to find that she was not an employee
Held, allowing appeal, that the Tribunal was wrong simply to follow Parfitt in the light of Percy v Board of National Mission of the Church of Scotland [2006] ICR 134 and that on the facts the Claimant was employed under a contract of service.

Underhill P J
[2010] UKEAT 0219 – 10 – 1503, [2011] ICR 819
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
CitedPresident of the Methodist Conference v Parfitt CA 1-Oct-1983
The claimant sought to assert that he as a minister of the Methodist Church who had been received into full connection had a contract of employment with the church. Having that contract, he said hat he had been unfairly dismissed.
Held: A . .
CitedPercy v Church of Scotland Board of National Mission HL 15-Dec-2005
The claimant appealed after her claim for sex discrimination had failed. She had been dismissed from her position an associate minister of the church. The court had found that it had no jurisdiction, saying that her appointment was not an . .
CitedDavies v Presbyterian Church of Wales HL 1986
A minister of the Presbyterian Church of Wales who had been inducted pastor of a united pastorate in Wales claimed unfair dismissal.
Held: If the existence or otherwise of the relationship of employer and employee is dependent solely upon the . .
LeaveMoore v The President of The Methodist Conference EAT 24-Nov-2010
EAT Jurisdictional Points : Worker, Employee or Neither – The claimant asserted the right not to be unfairly dismissed. She had been an ordained minister in Full Connection of the Methodist church.
Held: . .

Cited by:
Appeal fromThe President of The Methodist Conference v Preston CA 20-Dec-2011
The claimant had been an ordained minister in the church. She sought to claim unfair dismissal. The Conference replied that she was not an employee entitled to make such a claim.
Held: The claimant was an employee. . .
At EATMethodist Conference v Preston SC 15-May-2013
Minister was not an employee
The claimant asserted unfair dismissal. The Conference said that as an ordained minister she was not an employee, and was outwith the jurisdiction of such a claim.
Held: The Conference’s appeal succeeded (Baroness Hale dissenting). The essence . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment

Updated: 11 November 2021; Ref: scu.430554