UTIAC The conclusions of the European Court of Human Rights in Singh v Belgium (Application No. 33210/2011) neither justify nor require any departure from the guidance set out in Tanveer Ahmed [2002] Imm AR 318 (starred). The Tribunal in Tanveer Ahmed envisaged the existence of particular cases where it may be appropriate for enquiries to be made. On its facts Singh can properly be regarded as such a particular case. The documentation in that case was clearly of a nature where verification would be easy, and the documentation came from an unimpeachable source.
Allen, Jordan UTJJ
[2013] UKUT 253 (IAC)
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
Confirmed – Tanveer Ahmed v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Pakistan) IAT 19-Feb-2002
The following principles are applicable when considering documents submitted in resisting directions for removal: ‘1. In asylum and human rights cases it is for an individual claimant to show that a document on which he seeks to rely can be relied . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Immigration
Updated: 14 November 2021; Ref: scu.511228
