Mitford v Reynolds: 1842

A gift was made to the native inhabitans of Dacca. It was challenged as being void.
Held: As to whether a gift was charitable, the same principles apply when a particular class of inhabitants of a locality are the beneficiaries as when the the inhabitants as a whole are beneficiaries.
Lyndhurst LC said: ‘the term ‘the native inhabitants of Dacca’ is used in contradistinction to the European inhabitants or the descendants of European inhabitants.’

Citations:

(1842) 1 Ph 185

Cited by:

CitedGibbs v Harding and others ChD 12-Jan-2007
The testatrix left a will anticipating making another. The court was asked whether a clause leaving her estate to ‘be taken over by the Diocese of Westminster to hold in trust for the Black community of Hackney’ was valid.
Held: The gift was . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Charity

Updated: 01 May 2022; Ref: scu.247691