Michelle Gray v Southampton and S W Hampshire Health Authority: CA 8 Jun 2001

The claimant had been operated on with respect to treatment for a tumour. Following the operation she had a grand mal fit, and suffered serious impairment. She sought damages alleging want of proper care in the period immediately following the operation, and now appealed a finding against her claim.
Held: There was evidence which went to support the claimant’s case, but none of the experts said with confidence what the cause of her severe brain damage was.

Judges:

Lord Justice Aldous, Lord Justice May, Lord Justice Rix

Citations:

[2001] EWCA Civ 855, [2001] EWCA Civ 1234

Links:

Bailii, Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Professional Negligence

Updated: 01 June 2022; Ref: scu.160001