(Order discharged on appeal)
Judges:
Teare J
Citations:
[2008] EWHC 1556 (QB)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – Marketmaker Beijing Co Ltd and others v CMC Group Plc and others QBD 8-Oct-2004
Interim injunctions had been obtained to prevent the defendants carrying out certain banking transactions.
Held: The remedy sought and the claim was extravagant and unlikely to succeed. The injunctions should be discharged. It was not at all . .
Cited by:
See Also – Marketmaker Technology (Beijing) Co Ltd and Others v CMC Group Plc and Others QBD 24-Jun-2009
The claimants sought the committal of the fourth defendant for contempt having broken his undertaking to the court to provide details of his means.
Held: The terms of the undertaking were not ambiguous and could not be read in the way . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Contempt of Court
Updated: 27 August 2022; Ref: scu.271309