Magic Home Chef (Trade Mark: Opposition): IPO 4 Jan 2008

At first instance (see BL O/235/07) the Hearing officer had found the opponents successful under Section 5(2)(b).
The applicant appealed to the Appointed Person, claiming that the Hearing Officer had been wrong in his finding of similarity in the respective products. The Appointed Person, however, upheld the decision of the Hearing Officer.

[2008] UKIntelP o00208
Bailii
England and Wales

Intellectual Property

Updated: 01 November 2021; Ref: scu.456906