The defendant sought to challenge a decision of the court as to the applicable standard of proof in proceedings for the forfeiture of terrorist cash.
Held: The application was premature. No evidence had yet been served, and no findings of fact made. It was not yet possible to identify how the questions which the applicant sought to raise would be reflected in the proceedings.
Judges:
Roles LJ
Citations:
Times 27-Jul-2005
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Criminal Practice
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.229377