Loudon v Crimpy Crisps Ltd: 1966

In order to test whether there has been a redundancy the statute asks as to the requirements of the business for employees to do work of a particular kind. The personal attributes of the employee are not relevant except in so far as they reflect upon his ability to perform the relevant tasks.

Citations:

(1966) 1 ITR 307

Cited by:

CitedBritish Broadcasting Corporation v Farnworth EAT 13-Jul-1998
The claimant employee said that the non-renewal of her fixed term contract was not a redundancy as alleged.
Held: It could still be a redundancy situation when an employee is dismissed because the organisation requires an employee with more . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment

Updated: 30 April 2022; Ref: scu.214634