An application to the European Court of Human Rights was not an appeal. Where it was clear that any decision there would not affect the issues between the parties, there was no reason to suspend enforcement of the order which had given rise to the reference. A party complained at the lack of independence of the judge who had her trial, where he defended a possession summons. The possession order should go ahead.
Citations:
Times 13-Jun-2000, Gazette 22-Jun-2000
Statutes:
European Convention on Human Rights
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – Locabail (UK) Ltd and Another v Waldorf Investment Corporation and Others ChD 31-Mar-1999
A consent to a mortgage on a property, allowed a bank to substitute a second charge for the first, without the owners consent, but this was limited to the extent and value of the first charge. There was no argument to limit the effect of the second . .
Cited by:
Cited – Westminster City Council v Porter and Another ChD 30-Jul-2002
The claimant authority sought compensation from the respondents for acts committed whilst she had been a councillor. The auditor had certified that the respondents had caused losses amounting to 31 million pounds.
Held: Summary judgement was . .
See Also – Locabail (UK) Ltd and Another v Waldorf Investment Corporation and Others ChD 31-Mar-1999
A consent to a mortgage on a property, allowed a bank to substitute a second charge for the first, without the owners consent, but this was limited to the extent and value of the first charge. There was no argument to limit the effect of the second . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Human Rights, Litigation Practice
Updated: 25 October 2022; Ref: scu.83128