Little v BMI Chiltern Hospital: EAT 24 Apr 2009

EAT JURISDICTIONAL POINTS: Worker, employee or neither
Hospital bank porter. Whether an employee? Absence of mutuality of obligations. Prater (CA) and N.W. Probation v Edwards (EAT) distinguished. Employment Tribunal entitled to find he was not employed under a succession of short engagements. He could, on the facts, be sent home during a shift if no longer required to work, without pay, for the remainder of the shift.

Judges:

Peter Clark J

Citations:

[2009] UKEAT 0021 – 09 – 2404

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedDrake v Ipsos Mori UK Ltd EAT 25-Jul-2012
drake_ipsosEAT2012
EAT JURISDICTIONAL POINTS – Worker, employee or neither
The Claimant worked for the Respondent as a market researcher under a succession of individual assignments. The Employment Judge erred in law in . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment

Updated: 25 July 2022; Ref: scu.346599