The claimants appealed against costs decisions to the effect that a redacted ATE insurance ertificate did not comply with the Costs practice Direction, refusing relief from the sanction of disallowing the claim for the premium, and against reduction of the percentage uplift applied for the claimants success fee.
Judges:
Slade J
Citations:
[2012] EWHC 3376 (QB), [2013] 1 Costs LR 129, [2012] WLR(D) 373
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Costs
Updated: 25 July 2022; Ref: scu.466420