Lickbarrow And Another v Mason And Others: 9 Nov 1787

The consignor may stop goods in transit before they get into the hands of the consignee, in case of the insolvency of the consignee : but if the consignee assign the bills of lading to a third person for a valuable consideration, the right of the consignor as against such assignee is divested. There is no distinction between a bill of lading iridorsed in blank, and an indorsement to a particular person.

[1787] EngR 193, (1787) 2 TR 63, (1787) 100 ER 35
Commonlii
England and Wales
Cited by:
See AlsoMason And Others v Lickbarrow And Others 11-Feb-1790
. .
See AlsoLickbarrow v Mason 1793
. .
See AlsoWilliam Nowell Lickbarrow, And Another v Edward Mason, And Others (In Error) 14-Jun-1793
. .
See AlsoLickbarrow v Mason 2-Jul-1794
The attornment of a bill of lading is transferrable and therefore the indorsement and delivery of the bill of lading is capable of transferring the endorser’s right to the possession of the goods to the endorsee. . .
See AlsoLickbarrow v Mason 28-Nov-1794
. .
See AlsoLickbarrow And Others v Mason And Others HL 1827
Direction for venire facias de novo granted . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Transport, Contract

Updated: 19 January 2022; Ref: scu.368867