‘This case is the first occasion on which appeal courts have had to consider the proper interpretation of section 145B of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (the ‘1992 Act’), one of a group of provisions added to the 1992 Act by amendment in 2004. Its object, broadly stated, is to penalise offers made by employers to workers who are trade union members which, if accepted, would have the result that one or more terms of their employment will not (or will no longer) be determined by collective bargaining.’
Lord Briggs, Lady Arden, Lord Kitchin, Lord Leggatt, Lord Burrows
[2021] UKSC 47
Bailii, Bailii Summary, Bailii Issues and Facts
England and Wales
Citing:
Appeal from (CA) – Kostal UK Ltd v Dunkley and Others CA 13-Jun-2019
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 09 November 2021; Ref: scu.669013