Kent County Council v Brockman: 1996

The question of whether or not a defendant has done all that he can ‘reasonably be expected’ to do to comply with a planning enforcement notice is a matter for the tribunal of fact whether it be the magistrates or the jury.

Citations:

(1996) 1 PLR 1

Cited by:

CitedWood, Regina v CACD 25-May-2001
The appellant was a gipsy. He had bought land and occupied it with his family but without planning permission. He now appealed against a conviction for failing to comply with an enforcement notice. He appealed saying that he had not been allowed to . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Planning, Crime

Updated: 04 May 2022; Ref: scu.536025