JRRT (Investments) v Haycraft: ChD 1993

A purchaser of shares (under an inept agreement) raised a summons under RSC O.14A with the single issue of whether the purchaser was entitled to direct the vendor to vote the shares.
Chadwick J
[1993] BCLC 401
England and Wales
Citing:
FollowedMusselwhite v CH Musselwhite and Son Ltd ChD 1962
Parties had agreed to transfer shares in a small family company for the payment of a sum of money by way of instalments over a period of time. The agreement provided the transfers of the shares should be executed and that the executed transfers and . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 29 September 2021; Ref: scu.662433