Claim for damages for false imprisonment arising out of the imposition of what has been referred to as a curfew, namely a requirement that the claimant be present for a certain number of hours each day at specified premises after release from immigration detention centre.
Judges:
Lewis J
Citations:
[2017] EWHC 2821 (Admin)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – Jollah, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for The Home Department Admn 24-Feb-2017
Judicial review of refusal to lift curfew conditions . .
Cited by:
Appeal from – Jollah, Regina (on The Application of) v The Secretary of State for The Home Department CA 12-Jun-2018
. .
At Admin (2) – Jalloh, Regina (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department SC 12-Feb-2020
Claim for damages for false imprisonment brought in judicial review proceedings challenging the legality of a curfew imposed upon the claimant, purportedly under paragraph 2(5) of Schedule 3 to the Immigration Act 1971.
Held: The Court of . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Torts – Other, Immigration
Updated: 15 October 2022; Ref: scu.599409