J H Shannon v Country Casuals Holdings Plc: QBD 21 May 1997

A witness who was answering a sub poena ad duces tecum, is entitled to his costs incurred in complying with the order over and above just the conduct money. Such an order can lead to real additional costs.

Citations:

Times 16-Jun-1997, Gazette 21-May-1997

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Litigation Practice, Costs

Updated: 28 March 2022; Ref: scu.89189