The Respondent, a British subject born in Calcutta, had held from 1890 an appointment in the Public Works Department of the Indian Civil Service. Until 1920, with the exception of a period prior to 1890 spent in England for educational purposes, he had lived all his life in India, generally in hotels. In May, 1920, he left India on two years’ furlough, retiring from the Service on the expiration thereof, and had not since returned to India, but had lived in hotels in this country, in Paris and in Belgium. The periods of time spent in this country up to the date of his appeal to the Special Commissioners were as follows :-
1st November, 1920, to 3rd October, 1921.
22nd July, 1922, to 20th January, 1923.
21st June, 1923, to 11th December, 1923.
21st May, 1924, to 18th October, 1924.
12th May, 1925, to 25th May, 1925 {the date of the appeal).
He had no business interests in this country, and the sole object of his visits was to see friends. Under Section 17, Finance Act, 1923, the Respondent was assessed to Income Tax under Schedule E for the year 1924-25 in respect of a pension paid to him by the Bengal Government through the High Commissioner for India, but on appeal the Special Commissioners discharged the assessment, holding that the Respondent was not resident in the United Kingdom for the year in question.
Held, that there was evidence on which the Commissioners could come to their decision and that they had not misdirected themselves in law.
Citations:
[1926] EWHC 11 – TC – 289 (KB), 11 TC 289
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Income Tax
Updated: 11 October 2022; Ref: scu.681191