Butler-Sloss LJ P referred to the exceptionality required before restricting a parents right to remove a child within the jurisdiction, saying: ‘the principle enunciated in Re E . . that the court ought not in other than exceptional circumstances to impose a condition on a residence order to a primary carer who is providing entirely appropriate care for the child.’
Judges:
Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss P, Waller, Laws LJJ
Citations:
[2003] 1 FCR 138, [2002] EWCA Civ 1795
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – In re F (Children) CA 27-Oct-2010
The mother appealed against refusal of a specific issue order requested to allow her to remove the four children with her from Cleveland to Stronsay in the Orkneys. Both parents were GPs and accepted to be excellent parents. She and her new partner . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Children
Updated: 27 June 2022; Ref: scu.217905
