A true copy of a document was provided, but it was said that it could not be a true copy for an error as to the description of monthly payments.
Held: Bacon CJ said that a true copy did not necessarily need to be an exact copy: ‘but that it shall be so true that nobody reading it can by any possibility misunderstand it.’ This was ‘as purely a clerical error as can be imagined.’
Judges:
Bacon CJ
Citations:
(1882) 21 ChD 871
Statutes:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Carey v HSBC Bank plc, Yunis v Barclays Bank plc and similar QBD 23-Dec-2009
(Manchester Mercantile Court) The court considered the effects in detail where a bank was unable to comply with a request under section 78 of the 1974 Act to provide a copy of the agreement signed by the client.
Held: The court set out to give . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Contract
Updated: 09 November 2022; Ref: scu.384474