In re H (Children) ) (Residence Order: Condition): CA 30 Jul 2001

Thorpe LJ said: ‘What is the rationalisation for a different test to be applied to an application to relocate to Belfast, as opposed to, say, an application to relocate from Gloucester to Dublin? All that the court can do is to remember that in each and every case the decision must rest on the paramount principle of child welfare.’

Judges:

Thorpe, Astill JLJ

Citations:

[2001] EWCA Civ 1338, [2001] 2 FLR 1277, [2001] Fam Law 870, [2001] 2 FLR 77, [2001] 3 FCR 182

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedIn re F (Children) CA 27-Oct-2010
The mother appealed against refusal of a specific issue order requested to allow her to remove the four children with her from Cleveland to Stronsay in the Orkneys. Both parents were GPs and accepted to be excellent parents. She and her new partner . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Children

Updated: 13 June 2022; Ref: scu.201245