The court considered the status and effect of a notice of approximate redelivery date and intended port given by a time charterer to an owner pursuant to the requirements of a time charter in amended New York Produce Exchange Form. In essence, the question raised is whether the charterers may subsequent to the giving of such notice revise their plans, consistent nonetheless with redelivery of the vessel within the contractually agreed period. In reality, the question is which of the charterers and the owners may here take advantage of an unexpected opportunity to fix the vessel in a rising market.
Judges:
Tomlinson J
Citations:
[2009] EWHC 739 (Comm)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Cameron v Liverpool Victoria Insurance Co Ltd SC 20-Feb-2019
The Court was asked in what circumstances is it permissible to sue an unnamed defendant? The respondent was injured when her car collided with another. The care was insured but by a driver giving a false name. The car owner refused to identify him. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Transport, Arbitration
Updated: 31 January 2022; Ref: scu.331163