(CII, Regina v) Whether judge at preparatory hearing could rule against his sitting at any later trial and whether the ruling ought to have been the subject of an interlocutory appeal with a view to saving court time in the trial.
Citations:
[2009] EWCA Crim 1793, [2009] EWCA Crim B1, [2010] 1 WLR 1125, [2010] Crim LR 312, [2010] 1 Cr App R 10
Links:
Statutes:
Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, Criminal Justice Act 1987
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – BM, Regina v CACD 22-Mar-2018
The defendant appealed from a preliminary ruling that his body modification services were not in law capable of being consented to and therefore amounted to an assault.
Held: The appeal failed: ‘we can see no good reason why body modification . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Criminal Practice
Updated: 29 May 2022; Ref: scu.392891