Holt v EB Security Services: EAT 2 Mar 2011

EAT JURISDICTIONAL POINTS – Continuity of employment
The Employment Judge correctly analysed the circumstances leading to the termination of the Claimant’s first contract and the start of the second with an associated employer and found a gap of one week so destroying continuity under Employment Rights Act 1996 s 212(1). But there was no consideration of s 212(3) viz whether the gap was pursuant to an arrangement. Appeal allowed. Limited remission to the same Employment Judge.

Judges:

McMullen QC J

Citations:

[2011] UKEAT 0603 – 10 – 0203

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Employment

Updated: 13 July 2022; Ref: scu.432791